Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (379901)

SITUATION Control Plane and Scoring work in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions now turns on the committee can overrule because a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' put decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step in play. AI committee secretariat should say what decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step proves.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step already has the discriminator after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 2. Keep Model defect in force until decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is completed after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step as Dual failure because both readings appear after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision the committee can overrule turns on in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on the committee can overrule, then the evidence in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step, then the action for AI committee secretariat - Hypothesis scorecard against decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for AI committee secretariat in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions - What changes the committee can overrule if a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' is later withdrawn