Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (6e4b63)

SITUATION Deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job arrived with a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a hospital committee that never records dissent still has an evidence gap on whether the committee can overrule a business unit.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job reads as Policy or governance breach once a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job is closer to Model defect after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job for enterprise AI control-plane owner in a hospital committee that never records dissent. 4. Deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job is missing the fact enterprise AI control-plane owner needs after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job to the policy gate enterprise AI control-plane owner can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). If deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Lifecycle and Accountability, stop. If deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close, enterprise AI control-plane owner must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.