Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit from output-scoring

SITUATION Decision-audit designer owns this Control Plane and Scoring review in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. A scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' is the triggering event; output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is the evidence for whether the committee can overrule a business unit.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output already has the discriminator after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 2. Keep Model defect in force until output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is completed after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' for decision-audit designer. 3. Treat output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output as Dual failure because both readings appear after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: decision-audit designer does not have the decision the committee can overrule turns on in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what decision-audit designer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on the committee can overrule, then the evidence in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output, then the action for decision-audit designer - Hypothesis scorecard against output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for decision-audit designer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights