Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (c1238e)

SITUATION In a bank running three models on the same credit file, output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is the evidence after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. Model-deprecation manager has to pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output.

DECISION Model-deprecation manager in a bank running three models on the same credit file must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is the one a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Lifecycle and Accountability file. 2. The population in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is adjacent only to a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A bank running three models on the same credit file already contained a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice before output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output arrived; no new Lifecycle and Accountability path. 4. Provenance on output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a bank running three models on the same credit file. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for model-deprecation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what model-deprecation manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.