Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (1de31c)

SITUATION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner is responsible for the committee can overrule in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions, using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output as the only working extract. Drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show is what reset the timeline for this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output already has the discriminator after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 2. Keep Model defect in force until output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is completed after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner. 3. Treat output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output as Dual failure because both readings appear after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner does not have the decision the committee can overrule turns on in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.