Assess whether the contract vehicle is being used as intended from contract

SITUATION In a program office facing a diminishing-manufacturing source, contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern is the evidence after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function. Hill AF logistics data reviewer has to pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute for this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence close using contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern.

DECISION Hill AF logistics data reviewer in a program office facing a diminishing-manufacturing source must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Fund and move materiel now; contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern already has the discriminator after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function. 2. Keep Cannibalize or substitute in force until contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern is completed after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function for Hill AF logistics data reviewer. 3. Treat contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern as Defer a cycle because both readings appear after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function. 4. Refuse a Defense Sustainment close: Hill AF logistics data reviewer does not have the decision the contract vehicle is turns on in contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern. 2. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 3. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern against a new source that has never made this form-fit-function and write the one fact that would move the contract vehicle is for Hill AF logistics data reviewer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what Hill AF logistics data reviewer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on the contract vehicle is, then the evidence in contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern, then the action for Hill AF logistics data reviewer - Hypothesis scorecard against contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in contract vehicle vs. actual buy pattern after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite