Assess whether the contract vehicle is being used as intended (647ac2)

SITUATION The working file is unpriced contractual action aging list after document numbers that collide across two systems of record. Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract has to name Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute for this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after document numbers that collide across two systems of record.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in unpriced contractual action aging list is the one document numbers that collide across two systems of record named, so Fund and move materiel follows for this Depot Procurement Intelligence file. 2. The population in unpriced contractual action aging list is adjacent only to document numbers that collide across two systems of record; Cannibalize or substitute is the honest Defense Sustainment call. 3. A workload that shifted from organic repair to contract already contained document numbers that collide across two systems of record before unpriced contractual action aging list arrived; no new Depot Procurement Intelligence path. 4. Provenance on unpriced contractual action aging list after document numbers that collide across two systems of record is broken; do not pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 2. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in unpriced contractual action aging list. 3. Quantify mission impact if the contract vehicle is is deferred one cycle in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against document numbers that collide across two systems of record and write the one fact that would move the contract vehicle is for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (unpriced contractual action aging list after document numbers that collide across two systems of record). If unpriced contractual action aging list cannot force a Defense Sustainment label under Depot Procurement Intelligence, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on the contract vehicle is, then the evidence in unpriced contractual action aging list, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against unpriced contractual action aging list: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite - Depot Procurement Intelligence finding in unpriced contractual action aging list that a second reviewer can re-perform