Assess whether the contract vehicle is being used as intended (958060)

SITUATION The working file is unpriced contractual action aging list after lead times that doubled after a data-migration. Repair-vs-buy decision support lead in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources has to name Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute for this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

DECISION Repair-vs-buy decision support lead in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after lead times that doubled after a data-migration.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in unpriced contractual action aging list is the one lead times that doubled after a data-migration named, so Fund and move materiel follows for this Depot Procurement Intelligence file. 2. The population in unpriced contractual action aging list is adjacent only to lead times that doubled after a data-migration; Cannibalize or substitute is the honest Defense Sustainment call. 3. An engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources already contained lead times that doubled after a data-migration before unpriced contractual action aging list arrived; no new Depot Procurement Intelligence path. 4. Provenance on unpriced contractual action aging list after lead times that doubled after a data-migration is broken; do not pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify mission impact if the contract vehicle is is deferred one cycle in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources. 2. Reconcile depot demand in unpriced contractual action aging list to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after lead times that doubled after a data-migration. 3. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move unpriced contractual action aging list. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against lead times that doubled after a data-migration and write the one fact that would move the contract vehicle is for repair-vs-buy decision support lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (unpriced contractual action aging list after lead times that doubled after a data-migration). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what repair-vs-buy decision support lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on the contract vehicle is, then the evidence in unpriced contractual action aging list, then the action for repair-vs-buy decision support lead - Hypothesis scorecard against unpriced contractual action aging list: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for repair-vs-buy decision support lead in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources