Assess whether the contract vehicle is being used as intended (1dd07a)

SITUATION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst at a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract is reviewing unpriced contractual action aging list after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function. The question on that extract is whether the contract vehicle is being used as intended. The packet does not yet prove Fund and move materiel versus Cannibalize or substitute.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A new source that has never made this form-fit-function is noise around an already-controlled Depot Procurement Intelligence process in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract, given unpriced contractual action aging list. 2. A new source that has never made this form-fit-function is the event in unpriced contractual action aging list that forces Fund and move materiel for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst under Defense Sustainment. 3. Unpriced contractual action aging list shows a one-file miss after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function, not a Depot Procurement Intelligence program failure. 4. Unpriced contractual action aging list cannot decide the contract vehicle is yet after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function; hold is the only Defense Sustainment close a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 2. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in unpriced contractual action aging list. 3. Quantify mission impact if the contract vehicle is is deferred one cycle in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against a new source that has never made this form-fit-function and write the one fact that would move the contract vehicle is for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (unpriced contractual action aging list after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function). If unpriced contractual action aging list cannot force a Defense Sustainment label under Depot Procurement Intelligence, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract does not have.