Assess whether a control deficiency is significant or material (200c13)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
External counsel's accounting expert in a construction contractor on percentage-of-completion has one working extract — ghost-employee payroll extract — after a Big 4 inquiry on cutoff testing. If ghost-employee payroll extract cannot support a control deficiency is, the honest Forensic Accounting output is hold.
Decision
External counsel's accounting expert in a construction contractor on percentage-of-completion must choose A control deficiency is significant / Material using ghost-employee payroll extract after a Big 4 inquiry on cutoff testing.
Hypotheses to test
- External counsel's accounting expert can defend A control deficiency is significant from ghost-employee payroll extract after a Big 4 inquiry on cutoff testing in a Forensic Accounting challenge.
- External counsel's accounting expert cannot defend A control deficiency is significant from ghost-employee payroll extract; Material is what the extract actually supports after a Big 4 inquiry on cutoff testing.
- A Big 4 inquiry on cutoff testing never reached the population in ghost-employee payroll extract — reopen intake, do not close a control deficiency is.
- Two facts in ghost-employee payroll extract after a Big 4 inquiry on cutoff testing conflict for external counsel's accounting expert; hold this Occupational Fraud file.
Analysis required
- Quantify the entry if external counsel's accounting expert has to reverse it.
- Separate a close-process miss from a qualitative SAB 99 issue in a construction contractor on percentage-of-completion.
- Reconstruct vendor, journal, or inventory lines in ghost-employee payroll extract through the window opened by a Big 4 inquiry on cutoff testing.
- For this Forensic Accounting Occupational Fraud file, read ghost-employee payroll extract against a Big 4 inquiry on cutoff testing and write the one fact that would move a control deficiency is for external counsel's accounting expert.
Recommendation
Choose A control deficiency is significant / Material on this Forensic Accounting / Occupational Fraud packet (ghost-employee payroll extract after a Big 4 inquiry on cutoff testing). The follow-on Occupational Fraud action is what external counsel's accounting expert does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More Forensic Accounting prompts
- Assess whether books should be restated or merely adjusted (a99bce)
- Assess whether SAB 99 qualitative materiality is triggered after a board
- Assess whether cash ever economically changed hands after an SEC comment
- Assess whether a control deficiency is significant or material (d0947e)
- Assess whether books should be restated or merely adjusted (143119)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (818637)M&A Due Diligence
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (c45df5)M&A Due Diligence
- Whether to refer to law enforcement or keep civil from synthetic identityFraud Detection
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

