Assess whether cost history can support a fair-and-reasonable call from DMSMS

SITUATION In a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract, DMSMS alert vs. current stock position is the evidence after a BPA used for what looks like a major end item. Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst has to pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute for this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence close using DMSMS alert vs. current stock position.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using DMSMS alert vs. current stock position after a BPA used for what looks like a major end item.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in DMSMS alert vs. current stock position is the one a BPA used for what looks like a major end item named, so Fund and move materiel follows for this Depot Procurement Intelligence file. 2. The population in DMSMS alert vs. current stock position is adjacent only to a BPA used for what looks like a major end item; Cannibalize or substitute is the honest Defense Sustainment call. 3. A workload that shifted from organic repair to contract already contained a BPA used for what looks like a major end item before DMSMS alert vs. current stock position arrived; no new Depot Procurement Intelligence path. 4. Provenance on DMSMS alert vs. current stock position after a BPA used for what looks like a major end item is broken; do not pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 2. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in DMSMS alert vs. current stock position. 3. Quantify mission impact if cost history can support is deferred one cycle in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read DMSMS alert vs. current stock position against a BPA used for what looks like a major end item and write the one fact that would move cost history can support for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (DMSMS alert vs. current stock position after a BPA used for what looks like a major end item). If DMSMS alert vs. current stock position cannot force a Defense Sustainment label under Depot Procurement Intelligence, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on cost history can support, then the evidence in DMSMS alert vs. current stock position, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against DMSMS alert vs. current stock position: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in DMSMS alert vs. current stock position after a BPA used for what looks like a major end item, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite