Assess whether cost history can support a fair-and-reasonable call (54851a)

SITUATION Repair-history file that will not tie to cost arrived with UCAs older than the local policy cap for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst. That is a Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence decision on cost history can support in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using repair-history file that will not tie to cost after UCAs older than the local policy cap.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in repair-history file that will not tie to cost is the one UCAs older than the local policy cap named, so Fund and move materiel follows for this Depot Procurement Intelligence file. 2. The population in repair-history file that will not tie to cost is adjacent only to UCAs older than the local policy cap; Cannibalize or substitute is the honest Defense Sustainment call. 3. A workload that shifted from organic repair to contract already contained UCAs older than the local policy cap before repair-history file that will not tie to cost arrived; no new Depot Procurement Intelligence path. 4. Provenance on repair-history file that will not tie to cost after UCAs older than the local policy cap is broken; do not pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 2. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in repair-history file that will not tie to cost. 3. Quantify mission impact if cost history can support is deferred one cycle in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read repair-history file that will not tie to cost against UCAs older than the local policy cap and write the one fact that would move cost history can support for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (repair-history file that will not tie to cost after UCAs older than the local policy cap). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what obsolescence and DMSMS analyst does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on cost history can support, then the evidence in repair-history file that will not tie to cost, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against repair-history file that will not tie to cost: supported / rejected / untestable - Depot Procurement Intelligence finding in repair-history file that will not tie to cost that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in repair-history file that will not tie to cost after UCAs older than the local policy cap, if any