Assess whether custody defects make the result unusable from oral-fluid

SITUATION Specimen Validity work in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive now turns on custody defects make the because a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished put oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation in play. Oral-fluid implementation lead should say what oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation proves.

DECISION Oral-fluid implementation lead in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation reads as Accept the result once a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished is lined up to the same Forensic Drug Testing population. 2. Oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation is closer to Reject on custody after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished; Accept the result would over-claim this Specimen Validity extract. 3. Recollect is still live in oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation for oral-fluid implementation lead in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive. 4. Oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation is missing the fact oral-fluid implementation lead needs after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished; stop this Forensic Drug Testing close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a broken seal, timing miss, or donor explanation changes custody defects make the. 2. Confirm the kit ID in oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation matches the collection log. 3. Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive claims to run. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity file, read oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation against a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished and write the one fact that would move custody defects make the for oral-fluid implementation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Specimen Validity packet (oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished). Lead with the Forensic Drug Testing option oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation can support after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for oral-fluid implementation lead in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Forensic Drug Testing option on custody defects make the, then the evidence in oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation, then the action for oral-fluid implementation lead - Hypothesis scorecard against oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for oral-fluid implementation lead in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive - What changes custody defects make the if a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished is later withdrawn