Assess whether dealer overlays introduce prohibited steering (1db1c2)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files cannot treat a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class as color commentary on underwriting exception log by branch. Exam-response coordinator must close dealer overlays introduce prohibited from that extract under Fair Lending / CRA and Special-Purpose Programs.
Decision
Exam-response coordinator in a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using underwriting exception log by branch after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class.
Hypotheses to test
- Exam-response coordinator can defend Remove access or reverse the item from underwriting exception log by branch after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class in a Fair Lending challenge.
- Exam-response coordinator cannot defend Remove access or reverse the item from underwriting exception log by branch; Temporary compensating control is what the extract actually supports after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class.
- A SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class never reached the population in underwriting exception log by branch — reopen intake, do not close dealer overlays introduce prohibited.
- Two facts in underwriting exception log by branch after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class conflict for exam-response coordinator; hold this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
Analysis required
- Flag any disparate-impact table exam-response coordinator cannot explain from underwriting exception log by branch.
- Test a documented exception versus a pattern a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files must defend.
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in underwriting exception log by branch.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read underwriting exception log by branch against a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class and write the one fact that would move dealer overlays introduce prohibited for exam-response coordinator.
Recommendation
Choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold on this Fair Lending / CRA and Special-Purpose Programs packet (underwriting exception log by branch after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class). If underwriting exception log by branch cannot force a Fair Lending label under CRA and Special-Purpose Programs, stop. If underwriting exception log by branch after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class cannot support Remove access or reverse the item versus Temporary compensating control on this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs close, exam-response coordinator must do not infer a control or scheme beyond the transaction and entitlement evidence.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether a model update needs a fair-lending revalidation (1d904d)
- Assess whether pricing disparities are justified by legitimate factors
- Assess whether the exam response should concede a finding (cd1e8e)
- Assess whether the CRA plan is strategy or window dressing (9737f2)
- Assess whether the exam response should concede a finding (608f2c)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

