Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap

Situation

Board AI liaison in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools has one working extract — post-deployment drift report the owner never signed — after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. If post-deployment drift report the owner never signed cannot support deprecation of a legacy, the honest AI Governance output is hold.

Decision

Board AI liaison in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is the one a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Inventory and Regulatory Fit file.
• The population in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is adjacent only to a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call.
• A manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools already contained a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed before post-deployment drift report the owner never signed arrived; no new Inventory and Regulatory Fit path.
• Provenance on post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

Analysis required

• Walk the model input/output path recorded in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to.
• Walk the model input/output path recorded in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed and write the one fact that would move deprecation of a legacy for board AI liaison.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed). If post-deployment drift report the owner never signed cannot force a AI Governance label under Inventory and Regulatory Fit, stop. Do not invent pages a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools does not have.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on deprecation of a legacy, then the evidence in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, then the action for board AI liaison
• Hypothesis scorecard against post-deployment drift report the owner never signed: supported / rejected / untestable
• Missing page in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed, if any
• Regulatory or exam hook Inventory and Regulatory Fit would cite