Assess whether deprecation will strand a downstream process (ecfb61)

SITUATION Lifecycle and Accountability work in a bank running three models on the same credit file now turns on deprecation will strand a because a batch job still calling a retired endpoint put reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality in play. Model-deprecation manager should say what reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality proves.

DECISION Model-deprecation manager in a bank running three models on the same credit file must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A batch job still calling a retired endpoint is noise around an already-controlled Lifecycle and Accountability process in a bank running three models on the same credit file, given reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality. 2. A batch job still calling a retired endpoint is the event in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality that forces Policy or governance breach for model-deprecation manager under AI Governance Layer. 3. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality shows a one-file miss after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint, not a Lifecycle and Accountability program failure. 4. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot decide deprecation will strand a yet after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a bank running three models on the same credit file can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a bank running three models on the same credit file. 2. Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate model-deprecation manager can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let deprecation will strand a proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a batch job still calling a retired endpoint and write the one fact that would move deprecation will strand a for model-deprecation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what model-deprecation manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.