Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (9167dd)

SITUATION In a company whose agents can send email without a gate, decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is the evidence after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure. Decision-audit designer has to pick Disagreement should block, queue, or Log for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure is noise around an already-controlled Lifecycle and Accountability process in a company whose agents can send email without a gate, given decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step. 2. A customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure is the event in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step that forces Disagreement should block, queue, for decision-audit designer under AI Governance Layer. 3. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step shows a one-file miss after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure, not a Lifecycle and Accountability program failure. 4. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot decide disagreement should block, queue, yet after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a company whose agents can send email without a gate can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a company whose agents can send email without a gate. 3. Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step can support after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate.