Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (7fbe51)

SITUATION Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step arrived with a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared for multi-model reconciliation lead. That is a AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability decision on disagreement should block, queue, in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Multi-model reconciliation lead can defend Disagreement should block, queue, from decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. Multi-model reconciliation lead cannot defend Disagreement should block, queue, from decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step; Log is what the extract actually supports after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared. 3. A split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared never reached the population in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step — reopen intake, do not close disagreement should block, queue,. 4. Two facts in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared conflict for multi-model reconciliation lead; hold this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 3. Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate multi-model reconciliation lead can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what multi-model reconciliation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.