Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (b9f1f4)

SITUATION AI committee secretariat is responsible for disagreement should block, queue, in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy, using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output as the only working extract. A split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared is what reset the timeline for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output reads as Disagreement should block, queue, once a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is closer to Log after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared; Disagreement should block, queue, would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract. 3. A dual reading is still live in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 4. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is missing the fact AI committee secretariat needs after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 3. Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output can support after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.