Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (68d9ea)

SITUATION In a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA, reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is the evidence after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner has to pick Disagreement should block, queue, or Log for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is the one drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show named, so Disagreement should block, queue, follows for this Lifecycle and Accountability file. 2. The population in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is adjacent only to drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show; Log is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA already contained drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show before reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality arrived; no new Lifecycle and Accountability path. 4. Provenance on reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show is broken; do not pick Disagreement should block, queue, or Log yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let disagreement should block, queue, proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality can support after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA.