Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (0bd965)

SITUATION In an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor, reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is the evidence after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. Multi-model reconciliation lead has to pick Disagreement should block, queue, or Log for this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms close using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is the one two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file named, so Disagreement should block, queue, follows for this Audit and Vendor Terms file. 2. The population in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is adjacent only to two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; Log is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. An enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor already contained two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file before reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality arrived; no new Audit and Vendor Terms path. 4. Provenance on reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is broken; do not pick Disagreement should block, queue, or Log yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let disagreement should block, queue, proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what multi-model reconciliation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.