Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (97478d)

SITUATION Lifecycle and Accountability work in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy now turns on disagreement should block, queue, because drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show put vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors in play. Lifecycle and Accountability work in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy now turns on disagreement should block, queue, because drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show put vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors in play; AI committee secretariat should say what vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors proves for AI Governance Layer.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Disagreement should block, queue, now; vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors already has the discriminator after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 2. Keep Log in force until vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors is completed after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors as Disagreement should block, queue, because both readings appear after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision disagreement should block, queue, turns on in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 3. Map the control-plane score in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.