Assess whether a DMSMS hit is already a stock-out risk (cc3620)

SITUATION A sustainment cell after a failed repair turnaround has unpriced contractual action aging list in hand following a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x. Vendor-base mapper must determine whether a DMSMS hit is already a stock-out risk for this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

DECISION Vendor-base mapper in a sustainment cell after a failed repair turnaround must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x is noise around an already-controlled Depot Procurement Intelligence process in a sustainment cell after a failed repair turnaround, given unpriced contractual action aging list. 2. A repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x is the event in unpriced contractual action aging list that forces Fund and move materiel for vendor-base mapper under Defense Sustainment. 3. Unpriced contractual action aging list shows a one-file miss after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x, not a Depot Procurement Intelligence program failure. 4. Unpriced contractual action aging list cannot decide a DMSMS hit is yet after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x; hold is the only Defense Sustainment close a sustainment cell after a failed repair turnaround can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Reconcile depot demand in unpriced contractual action aging list to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x. 2. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move unpriced contractual action aging list. 3. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x and write the one fact that would move a DMSMS hit is for vendor-base mapper.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (unpriced contractual action aging list after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what vendor-base mapper does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on a DMSMS hit is, then the evidence in unpriced contractual action aging list, then the action for vendor-base mapper - Hypothesis scorecard against unpriced contractual action aging list: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in unpriced contractual action aging list after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite