Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (90be49)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses arrived with a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist for carve-out separation lead. That is a M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts decision on earnout definitions will cause in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice.
Decision
Carve-out separation lead in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is the one a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist named, so Proceed follows for this People and Contracts file.
- The population in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is adjacent only to a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist; Reprice is the honest M&A Due Diligence call.
- A health-system acquiring a specialty practice already contained a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist before customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses arrived; no new People and Contracts path.
- Provenance on customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist is broken; do not pick Proceed or Reprice yet.
Analysis required
- Test whether a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses.
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a health-system acquiring a specialty practice would inherit.
- For this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file, read customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses against a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist and write the one fact that would move earnout definitions will cause for carve-out separation lead.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts packet (customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist). Lead with the M&A Due Diligence option customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses can support after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for carve-out separation lead in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (2a3ed2)
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (429a59)
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (ab6fbe)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (8c8468)
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder after a customer
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

