Assess whether emergency allocation criteria are equitable and documented

SITUATION In a reorganization that moves programs across bureaus, reorganization FTE and system-cutover map is the evidence after a performance target that was quietly changed mid-year. Grant-compliance officer has to pick Pay or continue or Recoup for this Government Budget and Performance close using reorganization FTE and system-cutover map.

DECISION Grant-compliance officer in a reorganization that moves programs across bureaus must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using reorganization FTE and system-cutover map after a performance target that was quietly changed mid-year.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Reorganization FTE and system-cutover map reads as Pay or continue once a performance target that was quietly changed mid-year is maps to the same Government population. 2. Reorganization FTE and system-cutover map is closer to Recoup after a performance target that was quietly changed mid-year; Pay or continue would over-claim this Budget and Performance extract. 3. Deny is still live in reorganization FTE and system-cutover map for grant-compliance officer in a reorganization that moves programs across bureaus. 4. Reorganization FTE and system-cutover map is missing the fact grant-compliance officer needs after a performance target that was quietly changed mid-year; stop this Government close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check notice and appeal timing around a performance target that was quietly changed mid-year. 2. Trace the audit trail grant-compliance officer would produce for oversight. 3. Map eligibility, appropriation, and program rules in reorganization FTE and system-cutover map after a performance target that was quietly changed mid-year. 4. For this Government Budget and Performance file, read reorganization FTE and system-cutover map against a performance target that was quietly changed mid-year and write the one fact that would move emergency allocation criteria are for grant-compliance officer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Government / Budget and Performance packet (reorganization FTE and system-cutover map after a performance target that was quietly changed mid-year). If reorganization FTE and system-cutover map cannot force a Government label under Budget and Performance, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a reorganization that moves programs across bureaus does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government option on emergency allocation criteria are, then the evidence in reorganization FTE and system-cutover map, then the action for grant-compliance officer - Hypothesis scorecard against reorganization FTE and system-cutover map: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Budget and Performance would cite - Budget and Performance finding in reorganization FTE and system-cutover map that a second reviewer can re-perform