Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (646129)

Situation

An examiner request for the current model inventory put EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet in front of board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service. This AI Governance / Policy and Oversight close is explainability artifacts would survive from EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

Decision

Board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after an examiner request for the current model inventory.

Hypotheses to test

• An examiner request for the current model inventory is noise around an already-controlled Policy and Oversight process in a retailer using generative AI in customer service, given EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
• An examiner request for the current model inventory is the event in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet that forces Policy or governance breach for board AI liaison under AI Governance.
• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet shows a one-file miss after an examiner request for the current model inventory, not a Policy and Oversight program failure.
• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet cannot decide explainability artifacts would survive yet after an examiner request for the current model inventory; hold is the only AI Governance close a retailer using generative AI in customer service can defend.

Analysis required

• Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after an examiner request for the current model inventory.
• Map the approved-use case to the system explainability artifacts would survive would bind.
• Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after an examiner request for the current model inventory.
• For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against an examiner request for the current model inventory and write the one fact that would move explainability artifacts would survive for board AI liaison.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after an examiner request for the current model inventory). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on explainability artifacts would survive, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for board AI liaison
• Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable
• Policy and Oversight finding in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet that a second reviewer can re-perform
• Missing page in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after an examiner request for the current model inventory, if any