Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (13e4ca)

Situation

A board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' put generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft in front of model-risk officer in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor. This AI Governance / Policy and Oversight close is explainability artifacts would survive from generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

Decision

Model-risk officer in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.

Hypotheses to test

• Generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft reads as Policy or governance breach once a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
• Generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft is closer to Model defect after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Policy and Oversight extract.
• Dual failure is still live in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft for model-risk officer in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor.
• Generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft is missing the fact model-risk officer needs after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; stop this AI Governance close.

Analysis required

• Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.
• Map the approved-use case to the system explainability artifacts would survive would bind.
• Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.
• For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft against a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' and write the one fact that would move explainability artifacts would survive for model-risk officer.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'). Lead with the AI Governance option generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft can support after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable', then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for model-risk officer in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor.