Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (b104d0)

Situation

The desk packet is training-data provenance questionnaire after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose. Exam-readiness coordinator in an insurer scoring claims with a third-party model has to name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file.

Decision

Exam-readiness coordinator in an insurer scoring claims with a third-party model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using training-data provenance questionnaire after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Policy or governance breach now; training-data provenance questionnaire already has the discriminator after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
• Keep Model defect in force until training-data provenance questionnaire is completed after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose for exam-readiness coordinator.
• Treat training-data provenance questionnaire as Dual failure because both readings appear after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
• Refuse a AI Governance close: exam-readiness coordinator does not have the page the hiring tool should turns on in training-data provenance questionnaire.

Analysis required

• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate exam-readiness coordinator can actually point to.
• Walk the model input/output path recorded in training-data provenance questionnaire and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate exam-readiness coordinator can actually point to.
• For this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file, read training-data provenance questionnaire against a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for exam-readiness coordinator.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Bias and Training Data packet (training-data provenance questionnaire after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose). If training-data provenance questionnaire cannot force a AI Governance label under Bias and Training Data, stop. If training-data provenance questionnaire after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Bias and Training Data close, exam-readiness coordinator must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on the hiring tool should, then the evidence in training-data provenance questionnaire, then the action for exam-readiness coordinator
• Hypothesis scorecard against training-data provenance questionnaire: supported / rejected / untestable
• Bias and Training Data finding in training-data provenance questionnaire that a second reviewer can re-perform
• Missing page in training-data provenance questionnaire after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose, if any