Assess whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam (df3aba)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A bank with thin HMDA LAR quality cannot treat an exception rate twice as high for one group after credit controls as color commentary on model-reason-code mapping that does not match notices. Fair-lending officer must close HMDA data can be relied on from that extract under Fair Lending / CRA and Special-Purpose Programs.
Decision
Fair-lending officer in a bank with thin HMDA LAR quality must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using model-reason-code mapping that does not match notices after an exception rate twice as high for one group after credit controls.
Hypotheses to test
- Fair-lending officer can defend Remove access or reverse the item from model-reason-code mapping that does not match notices after an exception rate twice as high for one group after credit controls in a Fair Lending challenge.
- Fair-lending officer cannot defend Remove access or reverse the item from model-reason-code mapping that does not match notices; Temporary compensating control is what the extract actually supports after an exception rate twice as high for one group after credit controls.
- An exception rate twice as high for one group after credit controls never reached the population in model-reason-code mapping that does not match notices — reopen intake, do not close HMDA data can be relied on.
- Two facts in model-reason-code mapping that does not match notices after an exception rate twice as high for one group after credit controls conflict for fair-lending officer; hold this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
Analysis required
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in model-reason-code mapping that does not match notices.
- Check HMDA coding and underwriting policy against HMDA data can be relied on.
- Compare model-reason-code mapping that does not match notices to similarly situated files, second-review notes, and reason codes after an exception rate twice as high for one group after credit controls.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read model-reason-code mapping that does not match notices against an exception rate twice as high for one group after credit controls and write the one fact that would move HMDA data can be relied on for fair-lending officer.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether notices match the actual decisioning reasons (98e3a9)
- Assess whether a model update needs a fair-lending revalidation (3cba7a)
- Assess whether the exam response should concede a finding (4fa875)
- Assess whether the exam response should concede a finding (c03120)
- Assess whether line assignments have a disparate impact the bank will defend
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether the model score is a false positive from a life event (da0a23)Fraud Detection
- Assess whether a SAR narrative is supportable today (0c393a)Fraud Detection
- Assess whether product recall exposure is priced or excluded (d542d9)Insurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

