Assess whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam (1ba215)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
After a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test, small-business decline comparative file set is what fair-lending officer can touch in a bank with thin HMDA LAR quality. Fair Lending will live with Remove access or reverse the item versus Temporary compensating control on this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
Decision
Fair-lending officer in a bank with thin HMDA LAR quality must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using small-business decline comparative file set after a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Remove access or reverse the item now; small-business decline comparative file set already has the discriminator after a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test.
- Keep Temporary compensating control in force until small-business decline comparative file set is completed after a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test for fair-lending officer.
- Treat small-business decline comparative file set as Approve a documented exception because both readings appear after a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test.
- Refuse a Fair Lending close: fair-lending officer does not have the page HMDA data can be relied on turns on in small-business decline comparative file set.
Analysis required
- Flag any disparate-impact table fair-lending officer cannot explain from small-business decline comparative file set.
- Test a documented exception versus a pattern a bank with thin HMDA LAR quality must defend.
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in small-business decline comparative file set.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read small-business decline comparative file set against a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test and write the one fact that would move HMDA data can be relied on for fair-lending officer.
Recommendation
Choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold on this Fair Lending / CRA and Special-Purpose Programs packet (small-business decline comparative file set after a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test). The follow-on CRA and Special-Purpose Programs action is what fair-lending officer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether comparative files show second-review bias (19775a)
- Assess whether to pause a product pending a lookback (f94acd)
- Assess whether a special-purpose program is well designed or a pretext
- Assess whether the exam response should concede a finding (5bb606)
- Assess whether to pause a product pending a lookback (76cd3f)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether loss development requires a rate or a restriction (a981cd)Insurance Underwriting
- Assess whether telematics improvements offset driver quality (e26189)Insurance Underwriting
- EU AI Act implementation manager must resolve whether a generative-AIAI Governance
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

