Assess whether a household is receiving duplicate subsidies (3e0949)

Situation

A CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE put identity-proofing exception queue in front of SNAP trafficking investigator in a TANF office with thin work-participation documentation. This Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy close is a household is receiving from identity-proofing exception queue, and the live options are Pay or continue, Recoup, Deny.

Decision

SNAP trafficking investigator in a TANF office with thin work-participation documentation must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using identity-proofing exception queue after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE.

Hypotheses to test

• The population named in identity-proofing exception queue is the one a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE identified, so Pay or continue follows for this Recoupment and Policy file.
• The population in identity-proofing exception queue is only adjacent to a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE; Recoup is the honest Public Benefits call for SNAP trafficking investigator.
• A TANF office with thin work-participation documentation already contained a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE before identity-proofing exception queue arrived, so a household is receiving is not a new Recoupment and Policy path.
• Provenance on identity-proofing exception queue after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is broken; do not pick Pay or continue or Recoup for a household is receiving yet.

Analysis required

• Quantify overpayment if a household is receiving is wrong.
• Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a TANF office with thin work-participation documentation.
• Match household facts in identity-proofing exception queue to the rule that pays the benefit.
• For this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file, read identity-proofing exception queue against a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE and write the one fact that would move a household is receiving for SNAP trafficking investigator.

Recommendation

Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy packet (identity-proofing exception queue after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE). The follow-on Recoupment and Policy action is what SNAP trafficking investigator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.