Assess whether IP is owned or merely licensed (3b4f7b)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
IP is owned or merely licensed sits with carve-out separation lead because add-backs that are just delayed opex hit a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on. Evidence is management-team retention and key-person map; write the M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration option that extract can carry.
Decision
Carve-out separation lead in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on must choose IP is owned / Merely licensed using management-team retention and key-person map after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize IP is owned now; management-team retention and key-person map already has the discriminator after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
- Keep Merely licensed in force until management-team retention and key-person map is completed after add-backs that are just delayed opex for carve-out separation lead.
- Treat management-team retention and key-person map as IP is owned because both readings appear after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
- Refuse a M&A Due Diligence close: carve-out separation lead does not have the page IP is owned or merely licensed turns on in management-team retention and key-person map.
Analysis required
- Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in management-team retention and key-person map to IP is owned or merely licensed.
- Name the document carve-out separation lead still needs before signing.
- Test whether add-backs that are just delayed opex is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration file, read management-team retention and key-person map against add-backs that are just delayed opex and write the one fact that would move IP is owned or merely licensed for carve-out separation lead.
Recommendation
Choose IP is owned / Merely licensed on this M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration packet (management-team retention and key-person map after add-backs that are just delayed opex). Lead with the M&A Due Diligence option management-team retention and key-person map can support after add-backs that are just delayed opex, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for carve-out separation lead in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (091b59)
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (106e8e)
- Assess whether IP is owned or merely licensed (df3f96)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (71cfe9)
- Assess whether regulatory approval is a timing risk or a deal risk (6851a4)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether a warranty should be converted to a condition precedentInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether books should be restated or merely adjusted (72846b)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether the audit committee must be briefed this week (e6c9e2)Forensic Accounting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

