Assess whether management can run this without the founder (ee9cae)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION A customer who just sent a non-renewal put carve-out stranded-cost model in front of customer-contract risk reviewer in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate. This M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration close is management can run this from carve-out stranded-cost model, and the live options are Proceed, Reprice, Walk.
DECISION Customer-contract risk reviewer in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using carve-out stranded-cost model after a customer who just sent a non-renewal.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Proceed now; carve-out stranded-cost model already has the discriminator after a customer who just sent a non-renewal. 2. Keep Reprice in force until carve-out stranded-cost model is completed after a customer who just sent a non-renewal for customer-contract risk reviewer. 3. Treat carve-out stranded-cost model as Walk because both readings appear after a customer who just sent a non-renewal. 4. Refuse a M&A Due Diligence close: customer-contract risk reviewer does not have the decision management can run this turns on in carve-out stranded-cost model.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in carve-out stranded-cost model to management can run this. 2. Name the document customer-contract risk reviewer still needs before signing. 3. Test whether a customer who just sent a non-renewal is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away. 4. For this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration file, read carve-out stranded-cost model against a customer who just sent a non-renewal and write the one fact that would move management can run this for customer-contract risk reviewer.
RECOMMENDATION Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration packet (carve-out stranded-cost model after a customer who just sent a non-renewal). Lead with the M&A Due Diligence option carve-out stranded-cost model can support after a customer who just sent a non-renewal, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for customer-contract risk reviewer in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate.
COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line M&A Due Diligence option on management can run this, then the evidence in carve-out stranded-cost model, then the action for customer-contract risk reviewer - Hypothesis scorecard against carve-out stranded-cost model: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in carve-out stranded-cost model after a customer who just sent a non-renewal, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Separation and Integration would cite
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (293d16)
- Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (818637)
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (e2c392)
- Assess whether regulatory approval is a timing risk or a deal risk (0ecf12)
- Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (91046a)
Explore related decision areas
- Whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevantGovernment RFP
- Assess whether a control deficiency is significant or material (eef8a4)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether cyber controls claimed are actually in force (77efab)Insurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

