Assess whether management can run this without the founder (00669b)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Management can run this sits with carve-out separation lead because a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist hit a health-system acquiring a specialty practice. Evidence is working-capital peg versus seasonal reality; write the M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts option that extract can carry.
Decision
Carve-out separation lead in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist.
Hypotheses to test
- Working-capital peg versus seasonal reality reads as Proceed once a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist is lined up to the same M&A Due Diligence population.
- Working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is closer to Reprice after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist; Proceed would over-claim this People and Contracts extract.
- Walk is still live in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality for carve-out separation lead in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice.
- Working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is missing the fact carve-out separation lead needs after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist; stop this M&A Due Diligence close.
Analysis required
- Test whether a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality.
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a health-system acquiring a specialty practice would inherit.
- For this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file, read working-capital peg versus seasonal reality against a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist and write the one fact that would move management can run this for carve-out separation lead.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts packet (working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist). The follow-on People and Contracts action is what carve-out separation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (b7b03a)
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (009a60)
- Assess whether regulatory approval is a timing risk or a deal risk (4c153c)
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price after an HSR
- Assess whether IP is owned or merely licensed (aa6cc0)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether to quote, refer, or decline after a COPE refresh showingInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether pollution coverage should be site-specific or blanket (7e5864)Insurance Underwriting
- Assess whether product recall exposure is priced or excluded (861329)Insurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

