Assess whether monitoring detects drift or only outages from output-scoring

SITUATION The working file is output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. AI committee secretariat in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions has to name Monitoring detects drift or Only outages for this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Monitoring detects drift / Only outages using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Monitoring detects drift now; output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output already has the discriminator after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. 2. Keep Only outages in force until output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is completed after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output as Monitoring detects drift because both readings appear after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision monitoring detects drift or turns on in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let monitoring detects drift or proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move monitoring detects drift or for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Monitoring detects drift / Only outages on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). If output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Control Plane and Scoring, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on monitoring detects drift or, then the evidence in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output, then the action for AI committee secretariat - Hypothesis scorecard against output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes monitoring detects drift or if a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is later withdrawn - Named option among Monitoring detects drift, Only outages and the fact that kills the others