Assess whether the MRO interview was complete enough to verify from collector

SITUATION In a lab facing an adulterated-specimen spike, collector error log that repeats at one site is the evidence after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff. Return-to-duty coordinator has to pick Accept the result or Reject on custody for this Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity close using collector error log that repeats at one site.

DECISION Return-to-duty coordinator in a lab facing an adulterated-specimen spike must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using collector error log that repeats at one site after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in collector error log that repeats at one site is the one an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff named, so Accept the result follows for this Specimen Validity file. 2. The population in collector error log that repeats at one site is adjacent only to an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff; Reject on custody is the honest Forensic Drug Testing call. 3. A lab facing an adulterated-specimen spike already contained an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff before collector error log that repeats at one site arrived; no new Specimen Validity path. 4. Provenance on collector error log that repeats at one site after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is broken; do not pick Accept the result or Reject on custody yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol a lab facing an adulterated-specimen spike claims to run. 2. Walk chain of custody, collection site, and validity flags in collector error log that repeats at one site after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff. 3. Name the step return-to-duty coordinator cannot reconstruct from collector error log that repeats at one site. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity file, read collector error log that repeats at one site against an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff and write the one fact that would move the MRO interview was for return-to-duty coordinator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Specimen Validity packet (collector error log that repeats at one site after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff). If collector error log that repeats at one site cannot force a Forensic Drug Testing label under Specimen Validity, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a lab facing an adulterated-specimen spike does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Forensic Drug Testing option on the MRO interview was, then the evidence in collector error log that repeats at one site, then the action for return-to-duty coordinator - Hypothesis scorecard against collector error log that repeats at one site: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes the MRO interview was if an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is later withdrawn - Named option among Accept the result, Reject on custody, Recollect and the fact that kills the others