Whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant from CMMC 2.0
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
In a lab competing a Phase II SBIR, CMMC 2.0 practice-to-control mapping is the evidence after a key person who just resigned. CMMC implementation lead has to pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant for this Government RFP Capture and Pricing close using CMMC 2.0 practice-to-control mapping.
Decision
CMMC implementation lead in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using CMMC 2.0 practice-to-control mapping after a key person who just resigned.
Hypotheses to test
- CMMC implementation lead can defend Past performance will score from CMMC 2.0 practice-to-control mapping after a key person who just resigned in a Government RFP challenge.
- CMMC implementation lead cannot defend Past performance will score from CMMC 2.0 practice-to-control mapping; Be deemed not relevant is what the extract actually supports after a key person who just resigned.
- A key person who just resigned never reached the population in CMMC 2.0 practice-to-control mapping — reopen intake, do not close past performance will score.
- Two facts in CMMC 2.0 practice-to-control mapping after a key person who just resigned conflict for CMMC implementation lead; hold this Capture and Pricing file.
Analysis required
- Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what CMMC 2.0 practice-to-control mapping attaches.
- Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
- Score competitive posture if CMMC implementation lead pursues, partners, or no-bids.
- For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read CMMC 2.0 practice-to-control mapping against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for CMMC implementation lead.
Recommendation
Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (CMMC 2.0 practice-to-control mapping after a key person who just resigned). The follow-on Capture and Pricing action is what CMMC implementation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More Government RFP prompts
- Assess whether to price to win or walk from a buy-in after a CMMC assessor
- Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (5f535f)
- Assess whether Section M scoring math was applied consistently (e71038)
- Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (e7658a)
- Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (1b7507)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

