Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (720299)

Situation

Price-to-win analyst owns past performance will score inside a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work with price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate as the only packet. A teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is what changed the clock for this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file.

Decision

Price-to-win analyst in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.

Hypotheses to test

• Price-to-win analyst can defend Past performance will score from price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement in a Government RFP challenge.
• Price-to-win analyst cannot defend Past performance will score from price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate; Be deemed not relevant is what the extract actually supports after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.
• A teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement never reached the population in price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate — reopen intake, do not close past performance will score.
• Two facts in price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement conflict for price-to-win analyst; hold this Capture and Pricing file.

Analysis required

• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• Score competitive posture if price-to-win analyst pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate against a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for price-to-win analyst.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement). Lead with the Government RFP option price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate can support after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for price-to-win analyst in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work.