Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (b1780e)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Protest and Modifications work in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work now turns on past performance will score because a key person who just resigned put price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate in play. Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart should say what price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate proves.
Decision
Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after a key person who just resigned.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Past performance will score now; price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate already has the discriminator after a key person who just resigned.
- Keep Be deemed not relevant in force until price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate is completed after a key person who just resigned for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart.
- Treat price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate as Past performance will score because both readings appear after a key person who just resigned.
- Refuse a Government RFP close: protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart does not have the page past performance will score turns on in price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate.
Analysis required
- Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
- Score competitive posture if protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart pursues, partners, or no-bids.
- Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work cannot waive quietly.
- For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart.
Recommendation
Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after a key person who just resigned). The follow-on Protest and Modifications action is what protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More Government RFP prompts
- Assess whether key personnel substitutions will trigger evaluation risk
- Assess whether key personnel substitutions will trigger evaluation risk
- Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (8e2918)
- Assess whether a modification is in-scope or a new procurement (b430cd)
- Assess whether the teaming structure creates OCI or workshare risk (1a5923)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

