Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (89edc7)

Situation

A company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid cannot treat a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS as color commentary on shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps. Price-to-win analyst must close past performance will score from that extract under Government RFP / Protest and Modifications.

Decision

Price-to-win analyst in a company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.

Hypotheses to test

• Shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps reads as Past performance will score once a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
• Shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is closer to Be deemed not relevant after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS; Past performance will score would over-claim this Protest and Modifications extract.
• A dual reading is still live in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps for price-to-win analyst in a company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid.
• Shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is missing the fact price-to-win analyst needs after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS; stop this Government RFP close.

Analysis required

• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid cannot waive quietly.
• Map Section L/M requirements in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps to evaluator notes after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps attaches.
• For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps against a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for price-to-win analyst.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS). The follow-on Protest and Modifications action is what price-to-win analyst does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.