Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (18b3a8)

Situation

Contracts officer supporting a bid owns past performance will score inside a lab competing a Phase II SBIR with OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate as the only packet. A modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS is what changed the clock for this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file.

Decision

Contracts officer supporting a bid in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Past performance will score now; OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate already has the discriminator after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.
• Keep Be deemed not relevant in force until OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate is completed after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS for contracts officer supporting a bid.
• Treat OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate as Past performance will score because both readings appear after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.
• Refuse a Government RFP close: contracts officer supporting a bid does not have the page past performance will score turns on in OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate.

Analysis required

• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• Score competitive posture if contracts officer supporting a bid pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate against a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for contracts officer supporting a bid.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS). The follow-on Performance and Teaming action is what contracts officer supporting a bid does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.