Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (ac5a85)

Situation

After a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is what capture manager can touch in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR. Government RFP will live with Past performance will score versus Be deemed not relevant on this Protest and Modifications file.

Decision

Capture manager in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Past performance will score now; teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes already has the discriminator after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.
• Keep Be deemed not relevant in force until teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is completed after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement for capture manager.
• Treat teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes as Past performance will score because both readings appear after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.
• Refuse a Government RFP close: capture manager does not have the page past performance will score turns on in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes.

Analysis required

• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• Score competitive posture if capture manager pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a lab competing a Phase II SBIR cannot waive quietly.
• For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for capture manager.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement). Lead with the Government RFP option teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes can support after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for capture manager in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR.