Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (9ec77e)

SITUATION In a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions, post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime is the evidence after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. AI committee secretariat has to pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring close using post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime is the one a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Control Plane and Scoring file. 2. The population in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime is adjacent only to a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions already contained a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice before post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime arrived; no new Control Plane and Scoring path. 4. Provenance on post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.