Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (a5cef4)

SITUATION Committee charter that does not define escalation arrived with an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output for enterprise AI control-plane owner. That is a AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms decision on procurement should fail a in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using committee charter that does not define escalation after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; committee charter that does not define escalation already has the discriminator after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output. 2. Keep Model defect in force until committee charter that does not define escalation is completed after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output for enterprise AI control-plane owner. 3. Treat committee charter that does not define escalation as Dual failure because both readings appear after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: enterprise AI control-plane owner does not have the decision procurement should fail a turns on in committee charter that does not define escalation.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in committee charter that does not define escalation was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. 3. Map the control-plane score in committee charter that does not define escalation to the policy gate enterprise AI control-plane owner can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read committee charter that does not define escalation against an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (committee charter that does not define escalation after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what enterprise AI control-plane owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on procurement should fail a, then the evidence in committee charter that does not define escalation, then the action for enterprise AI control-plane owner - Hypothesis scorecard against committee charter that does not define escalation: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Audit and Vendor Terms would cite - Audit and Vendor Terms finding in committee charter that does not define escalation that a second reviewer can re-perform