Assess whether a protest is rational after debrief (35d81f)

Situation

Capture manager in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft has one working extract — past-performance recency and relevance scorecard — after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS. If past-performance recency and relevance scorecard cannot support a protest is rational, the honest Government RFP output is hold.

Decision

Capture manager in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Pursue now; past-performance recency and relevance scorecard already has the discriminator after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.
• Keep Pursue with conditions in force until past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is completed after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS for capture manager.
• Treat past-performance recency and relevance scorecard as Partner because both readings appear after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.
• Refuse a Government RFP close: capture manager does not have the page a protest is rational turns on in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs a protest is rational.
• For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS and write the one fact that would move a protest is rational for capture manager.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS). If past-performance recency and relevance scorecard cannot force a Government RFP label under Capture and Pricing, stop. If past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS cannot support Pursue versus Pursue with conditions on this Government RFP Capture and Pricing close, capture manager must identify the Section L/M or evaluation criterion that remains unproven rather than filling the gap.