Assess whether the result is a refusal, a negative dilute, or a recollect

SITUATION In an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive, a donor claiming the seal was already broken put prescription that could explain an opioid positive in play. Oral-fluid implementation lead should decide whether the result is a refusal, a negative dilute, or a recollect without filling gaps prescription that could explain an opioid positive does not contain.

DECISION Oral-fluid implementation lead in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive must choose The result is a refusal, a negative dilute, / A recollect using prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a donor claiming the seal was already broken.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A donor claiming the seal was already broken is noise around an already-controlled Specimen Validity process in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive, given prescription that could explain an opioid positive. 2. A donor claiming the seal was already broken is the event in prescription that could explain an opioid positive that forces The result is a refusal, a negative dilute, for oral-fluid implementation lead under Forensic Drug Testing. 3. Prescription that could explain an opioid positive shows a one-file miss after a donor claiming the seal was already broken, not a Specimen Validity program failure. 4. Prescription that could explain an opioid positive cannot decide the result is a yet after a donor claiming the seal was already broken; hold is the only Forensic Drug Testing close an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive claims to run. 2. Walk chain of custody, collection site, and validity flags in prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a donor claiming the seal was already broken. 3. Name the step oral-fluid implementation lead cannot reconstruct from prescription that could explain an opioid positive. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity file, read prescription that could explain an opioid positive against a donor claiming the seal was already broken and write the one fact that would move the result is a for oral-fluid implementation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose The result is a refusal, a negative dilute, / A recollect on this Forensic Drug Testing / Specimen Validity packet (prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a donor claiming the seal was already broken). The follow-on Specimen Validity action is what oral-fluid implementation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Forensic Drug Testing option on the result is a, then the evidence in prescription that could explain an opioid positive, then the action for oral-fluid implementation lead - Hypothesis scorecard against prescription that could explain an opioid positive: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes the result is a if a donor claiming the seal was already broken is later withdrawn - Named option among The result is a refusal, a negative dilute,, A recollect and the fact that kills the others