Assess whether the RIA would survive OIRA and litigation after a grant

SITUATION The working file is performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored. Regulatory-impact analyst in a pass-through grantor after a subrecipient audit has to name Pay or continue or Recoup for this Government Budget and Performance file.

DECISION Regulatory-impact analyst in a pass-through grantor after a subrecipient audit must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Regulatory-impact analyst can defend Pay or continue from performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored in a Government challenge. 2. Regulatory-impact analyst cannot defend Pay or continue from performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems; Recoup is what the extract actually supports after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored. 3. A grant condition OIG says was never monitored never reached the population in performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems — reopen intake, do not close the RIA would survive. 4. Two facts in performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored conflict for regulatory-impact analyst; hold this Budget and Performance file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map eligibility, appropriation, and program rules in performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored. 2. Name the statutory hook that performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems does or does not support. 3. Test a single-case exception versus a control gap in a pass-through grantor after a subrecipient audit. 4. For this Government Budget and Performance file, read performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems against a grant condition OIG says was never monitored and write the one fact that would move the RIA would survive for regulatory-impact analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Government / Budget and Performance packet (performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored). Lead with the Government option performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems can support after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for regulatory-impact analyst in a pass-through grantor after a subrecipient audit.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government option on the RIA would survive, then the evidence in performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems, then the action for regulatory-impact analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against performance-measure set that cannot be produced from systems: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for regulatory-impact analyst in a pass-through grantor after a subrecipient audit - What changes the RIA would survive if a grant condition OIG says was never monitored is later withdrawn