Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (c13cba)

SITUATION After an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall, protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors is what proposal compliance lead can touch in a company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid. Government RFP will live with Pursue versus Pursue with conditions on this Compliance and Cyber Requirements file.

DECISION Proposal compliance lead in a company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Proposal compliance lead can defend Pursue from protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall in a Government RFP challenge. 2. Proposal compliance lead cannot defend Pursue from protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors; Pursue with conditions is what the extract actually supports after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall. 3. An OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall never reached the population in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors — reopen intake, do not close the SBIR data-rights assertions. 4. Two facts in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall conflict for proposal compliance lead; hold this Compliance and Cyber Requirements file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map Section L/M requirements in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors to evaluator notes after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall. 2. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors attaches. 3. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors against an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for proposal compliance lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall). If protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors cannot force a Government RFP label under Compliance and Cyber Requirements, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors, then the action for proposal compliance lead - Hypothesis scorecard against protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes the SBIR data-rights assertions if an OCI letter naming an affiliate you forgot to firewall is later withdrawn - Named option among Pursue, Pursue with conditions, Partner and the fact that kills the others