Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (00ef83)

Situation

Exam-readiness coordinator owns a shadow system must inside a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor with hiring-tool adverse-impact tables as the only packet. A near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is what changed the clock for this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file.

Decision

Exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.

Hypotheses to test

• Exam-readiness coordinator can defend Policy or governance breach from hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed in a AI Governance challenge.
• Exam-readiness coordinator cannot defend Policy or governance breach from hiring-tool adverse-impact tables; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.
• A near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed never reached the population in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables — reopen intake, do not close a shadow system must.
• Two facts in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed conflict for exam-readiness coordinator; hold this Vendors and Agentic Systems file.

Analysis required

• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate exam-readiness coordinator can actually point to.
• Walk the model input/output path recorded in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate exam-readiness coordinator can actually point to.
• For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read hiring-tool adverse-impact tables against a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for exam-readiness coordinator.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed). Lead with the AI Governance option hiring-tool adverse-impact tables can support after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor.