Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (b976cc)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A shadow system must sits with model-risk officer because a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose hit a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor. Evidence is hiring-tool adverse-impact tables; write the AI Governance Policy and Oversight option that extract can carry.
Decision
Model-risk officer in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
Hypotheses to test
- Model-risk officer can defend Policy or governance breach from hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose in a AI Governance challenge.
- Model-risk officer cannot defend Policy or governance breach from hiring-tool adverse-impact tables; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
- A new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose never reached the population in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables — reopen intake, do not close a shadow system must.
- Two facts in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose conflict for model-risk officer; hold this Policy and Oversight file.
Analysis required
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate model-risk officer can actually point to.
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate model-risk officer can actually point to.
- For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read hiring-tool adverse-impact tables against a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for model-risk officer.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what model-risk officer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether the board has been accurately briefed (b1808b)
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (a7c8c4)
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (cf9e56)
- Assess whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process (f17853)
- Assess whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process (7f2db3)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

